The HP-33E/C that could have been.
|
01-06-2023, 08:48 AM
Post: #4
|
|||
|
|||
RE: The HP-33E/C that could have been.
Couldn't the HP do the same thing with about half the number of steps? STO 1 and RCL 1 for example each took two steps on the TI, but were merged into a single one on the HP. I was met with many of this kind of thing when I went from the TI-59 to the HP-41.
http://WilsonMinesCo.com (Lots of HP-41 links at the bottom of the links page, at http://wilsonminesco.com/links.html#hp41 ) |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
The HP-33E/C that could have been. - Matt Agajanian - 01-06-2023, 04:59 AM
RE: The HP-33E/C that could have been. - brouhaha - 01-06-2023, 06:27 AM
RE: The HP-33E/C that could have been. - lvt - 01-06-2023, 07:43 AM
RE: The HP-33E/C that could have been. - Garth Wilson - 01-06-2023 08:48 AM
RE: The HP-33E/C that could have been. - Kostas Kritsilas - 01-07-2023, 03:37 AM
RE: The HP-33E/C that could have been. - Matt Agajanian - 01-07-2023, 06:03 AM
RE: The HP-33E/C that could have been. - brouhaha - 01-07-2023, 06:20 AM
RE: The HP-33E/C that could have been. - Kostas Kritsilas - 01-07-2023, 09:19 AM
RE: The HP-33E/C that could have been. - Matt Agajanian - 01-07-2023, 07:45 PM
RE: The HP-33E/C that could have been. - Matt Agajanian - 01-07-2023, 07:49 PM
RE: The HP-33E/C that could have been. - Steve Simpkin - 01-07-2023, 08:21 PM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)