The HP-33E/C that could have been.
|
01-07-2023, 03:37 AM
Post: #5
|
|||
|
|||
RE: The HP-33E/C that could have been.
Its not a 2:1 difference in all instances. The 2nd and INV keys on the TIs were generally NOT separate keystrokes, or program steps, if you want to think of it that way. There is not doubt that the equivalent programs used fewer program steps (on HPs with merged program steps), but the relationship is a lot more complex than assuming a straight 2:1 or 3:1 relationship; it is very dependent on what the program actually did, and how it was programmed.
|
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
The HP-33E/C that could have been. - Matt Agajanian - 01-06-2023, 04:59 AM
RE: The HP-33E/C that could have been. - brouhaha - 01-06-2023, 06:27 AM
RE: The HP-33E/C that could have been. - lvt - 01-06-2023, 07:43 AM
RE: The HP-33E/C that could have been. - Garth Wilson - 01-06-2023, 08:48 AM
RE: The HP-33E/C that could have been. - Kostas Kritsilas - 01-07-2023 03:37 AM
RE: The HP-33E/C that could have been. - Matt Agajanian - 01-07-2023, 06:03 AM
RE: The HP-33E/C that could have been. - brouhaha - 01-07-2023, 06:20 AM
RE: The HP-33E/C that could have been. - Kostas Kritsilas - 01-07-2023, 09:19 AM
RE: The HP-33E/C that could have been. - Matt Agajanian - 01-07-2023, 07:45 PM
RE: The HP-33E/C that could have been. - Matt Agajanian - 01-07-2023, 07:49 PM
RE: The HP-33E/C that could have been. - Steve Simpkin - 01-07-2023, 08:21 PM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)