The HP-33E/C that could have been.
|
01-07-2023, 09:19 AM
(This post was last modified: 01-07-2023 09:21 AM by Kostas Kritsilas.)
Post: #8
|
|||
|
|||
RE: The HP-33E/C that could have been.
Going strictly from memory of those days, I believe that the contemporary calculator for the HP-25/25C was the TI-58/58C. and the TI-58/58C had 480 partially merged program steps, maximum (I seem to recall that you could re-allocate program steps to registers). The HP-67 (224 fully merged steps) equivalent was the TI-59 (960 partially merged steps). The later HP-29C had 98 or 100 fully merged steps, and a bunch of added programming features over the HP-25/25C like indirect addressing and subroutines, some of which were in the TI-58/58C already.
The earlier generation programmables were the HP-55 (49 un-merged steps) and HP-65 (100 un-merged(?) steps) vs. the SR-56 (100 un-merged steps) and SR-52 (I don't remember how many steps it had). I also don't recall the register counts for each. |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
The HP-33E/C that could have been. - Matt Agajanian - 01-06-2023, 04:59 AM
RE: The HP-33E/C that could have been. - brouhaha - 01-06-2023, 06:27 AM
RE: The HP-33E/C that could have been. - lvt - 01-06-2023, 07:43 AM
RE: The HP-33E/C that could have been. - Garth Wilson - 01-06-2023, 08:48 AM
RE: The HP-33E/C that could have been. - Kostas Kritsilas - 01-07-2023, 03:37 AM
RE: The HP-33E/C that could have been. - Matt Agajanian - 01-07-2023, 06:03 AM
RE: The HP-33E/C that could have been. - brouhaha - 01-07-2023, 06:20 AM
RE: The HP-33E/C that could have been. - Kostas Kritsilas - 01-07-2023 09:19 AM
RE: The HP-33E/C that could have been. - Matt Agajanian - 01-07-2023, 07:45 PM
RE: The HP-33E/C that could have been. - Matt Agajanian - 01-07-2023, 07:49 PM
RE: The HP-33E/C that could have been. - Steve Simpkin - 01-07-2023, 08:21 PM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)