The HP-33E/C that could have been.
|
01-07-2023, 08:21 PM
Post: #11
|
|||
|
|||
RE: The HP-33E/C that could have been.
(01-07-2023 09:19 AM)Kostas Kritsilas Wrote: Going strictly from memory of those days, I believe that the contemporary calculator for the HP-25/25C was the TI-58/58C. and the TI-58/58C had 480 partially merged program steps, maximum (I seem to recall that you could re-allocate program steps to registers). The HP-67 (224 fully merged steps) equivalent was the TI-59 (960 partially merged steps). The later HP-29C had 98 or 100 fully merged steps, and a bunch of added programming features over the HP-25/25C like indirect addressing and subroutines, some of which were in the TI-58/58C already. It is interesting to look at the U.S. street prices for these TI models when they were introduced compared to HP models at the time. When the TI-57/58/59 were introduced around May 1977, the TI-58 was the same price ($100) as a HP-25. The TI-58 was much cheaper than the HP-29C ($159) which was introduced around the same time. The following advertisement is from the October 1977 issue of Popular Electronics magazine. Just a few months earlier (June 1977) the following ad from the same magazine shows the SR-56 selling for considerably less ($79) than the HP-25 ($116) at that time. The TI-58C appears to have been introduced sometime in 1979, the same year as the HP-34C and HP-33C. Interestingly TI did not create a CMOS version of the memory chip used in the TI-58. Instead they bought a standard CMOS RAM chip (RCA) and developed a custom chip to interface to it. The result is a substantial redesign of the PCB. http://www.datamath.org/Sci/WEDGE/TI-58C.htm |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
The HP-33E/C that could have been. - Matt Agajanian - 01-06-2023, 04:59 AM
RE: The HP-33E/C that could have been. - brouhaha - 01-06-2023, 06:27 AM
RE: The HP-33E/C that could have been. - lvt - 01-06-2023, 07:43 AM
RE: The HP-33E/C that could have been. - Garth Wilson - 01-06-2023, 08:48 AM
RE: The HP-33E/C that could have been. - Kostas Kritsilas - 01-07-2023, 03:37 AM
RE: The HP-33E/C that could have been. - Matt Agajanian - 01-07-2023, 06:03 AM
RE: The HP-33E/C that could have been. - brouhaha - 01-07-2023, 06:20 AM
RE: The HP-33E/C that could have been. - Kostas Kritsilas - 01-07-2023, 09:19 AM
RE: The HP-33E/C that could have been. - Matt Agajanian - 01-07-2023, 07:45 PM
RE: The HP-33E/C that could have been. - Matt Agajanian - 01-07-2023, 07:49 PM
RE: The HP-33E/C that could have been. - Steve Simpkin - 01-07-2023 08:21 PM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)