RPN programming model survey
|
01-15-2023, 11:02 PM
(This post was last modified: 01-15-2023 11:04 PM by Joe Horn.)
Post: #6
|
|||
|
|||
RE: RPN programming model survey
(01-15-2023 07:41 PM)Gene Wrote: Gene: As far as I know, EVERY programmable model (TI or HP) that uses GTO line numbers (Znnn) will point to the wrong line once you delete line Znnn. The difference with the 35s is that, unlike other models, it tries to compensate for the deletion when you try to replace the deleted line. Example on the 35s: A001 LBL A A002 2 A003 3 A004 4 A005 GOTO A003 Now delete line A003 and replace it with 3.333 and see that the program has become this: A001 LBL A A002 2 A003 3.333 A004 4 A005 GOTO A004 I don't think any other model screws things up that badly. Yes, I know that this particular example's problem can be avoided by inserting 3.33 after line A003, then backstepping and deleting A003 ... but that's a workaround for a bad design, IMHO. <0|ΙΈ|0> -Joe- |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
RPN programming model survey - brouhaha - 01-15-2023, 01:48 AM
RE: RPN programming model survey - Joe Horn - 01-15-2023, 02:45 AM
RE: RPN programming model survey - Valentin Albillo - 01-15-2023, 05:09 AM
RE: RPN programming model survey - Gene - 01-15-2023, 07:41 PM
RE: RPN programming model survey - Joe Horn - 01-15-2023 11:02 PM
RE: RPN programming model survey - rprosperi - 01-15-2023, 02:01 PM
RE: RPN programming model survey - brouhaha - 01-16-2023, 01:59 AM
RE: RPN programming model survey - rprosperi - 01-16-2023, 02:27 PM
RE: RPN programming model survey - brouhaha - 01-18-2023, 12:55 AM
RE: RPN programming model survey - DGM - 01-16-2023, 12:18 AM
RE: RPN programming model survey - David Hayden - 01-26-2023, 03:08 PM
RE: RPN programming model survey - Maximilian Hohmann - 01-26-2023, 03:30 PM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)