the worst?

[John Garza (3665)]

Perfection takes time.
The first pass at something innovative is usually not a very smooth implementation.

The 35, 65, and 41C were all incredible advances that made them 'game changers'.
And each had their share of issues and design oddities.
And the successor machines were all better:
The 45, the 67, and the 42.

Regardless of the 'innovation tax' that must be paid, the 41C was considered revolutionary, sold well, and made an impact on the competition. And as I recall, both TI and Novus cancelled new products in development when they saw the new 41C.

-J

[35/45/55/80/70/65/67/67T/97/97S/91/92/21/22/27/25C/29C/19C/10/
31E/32E/33C/34C/37E/38C/41CX/71B/28S/19BII/12C/15C/33S/35S/32SII/
48GX/50G/Prime/DM42]