DB48X: HP48-like RPL implementation for DM42

[Claudio L.]

(07-18-2023 08:06 AM)c3d Wrote:  Another thing I am considering is a "list processing" variant of `for`, e.g.

Code:


'X' { 1 2 3 45 } for i i + next

would give you X+1+2+3+45

I like this, but wouldn't it be better to perhaps name it 'foreach'? so as to not confuse the user with the usage of for.

I'm also liking your extension to use vectors and lists in local variable definitions. We should try and coordinate (standardize?) these extensions to RPL so as to minimize differences between dialects.