HP-67 versus TI-58
|
08-02-2023, 06:57 AM
Post: #10
|
|||
|
|||
RE: HP-67 versus TI-58
(08-02-2023 06:12 AM)teenix Wrote: The HP-35, like all the hand-held HPs that followed, was required to remain undamaged after falling three feet onto concrete on each of its corners. The electronics I believe will not be damaged when overloaded with 1G, but the corners will be deformed, I don't believe there will be damage in the corners, after all it's quite fragile material. The calculator is connected around the perimeter with 6 long screws, so it can withstand a fall from 20 meters. |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
HP-67 versus TI-58 - Josef - 07-30-2023, 05:39 PM
RE: HP-67 versus TI-58 - John Garza (3665) - 08-01-2023, 12:03 AM
RE: HP-67 versus TI-58 - toml_12953 - 08-01-2023, 12:16 AM
RE: HP-67 versus TI-58 - teenix - 08-02-2023, 06:12 AM
RE: HP-67 versus TI-58 - Josef - 08-02-2023 06:57 AM
RE: HP-67 versus TI-58 - HP67 - 08-01-2023, 08:17 AM
RE: HP-67 versus TI-58 - Josef - 08-01-2023, 05:36 PM
RE: HP-67 versus TI-58 - Josef - 08-01-2023, 05:06 AM
RE: HP-67 versus TI-58 - John Garza (3665) - 08-01-2023, 08:33 PM
RE: HP-67 versus TI-58 - Josef - 08-02-2023, 05:25 AM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)