Numerical implementations
|
08-22-2023, 05:16 AM
(This post was last modified: 08-22-2023 05:16 AM by nickapos.)
Post: #4
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Numerical implementations
(08-21-2023 04:30 PM)KeithB Wrote: Here is a good example from the Prime: I think this is a problem that exists with most tools, when you try to exceed their designed accuracy. In this particular case cas is more accurate and lots of people are using prime in cas mode exclusively but cas is not allowed during exams, hence the option to use home. In addition to that, all software has bugs. This also applies to excel. The only way forward is by iterative improvements and potentially the regular recalibration of tools against a reference which is good practice anyway. If you calibrate your instruments regularly you know exactly where you stand. |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
Numerical implementations - NicolaB - 08-19-2023, 12:53 PM
RE: Numerical implementations - pier4r - 08-21-2023, 01:36 PM
RE: Numerical implementations - KeithB - 08-21-2023, 04:30 PM
RE: Numerical implementations - nickapos - 08-22-2023 05:16 AM
RE: Numerical implementations - Steve Simpkin - 08-22-2023, 06:16 AM
RE: Numerical implementations - nickapos - 08-22-2023, 02:49 PM
RE: Numerical implementations - pier4r - 08-22-2023, 08:31 PM
RE: Numerical implementations - nickapos - 08-23-2023, 03:33 AM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)