No multi-statement 991CW—It’s peculiar
|
08-26-2023, 06:36 PM
(This post was last modified: 08-26-2023 06:39 PM by Albert Chan.)
Post: #7
|
|||
|
|||
RE: No multi-statement 991CW—It’s peculiar
Hi, Irdheat
Multi-statements is like a program. Here is an example, calculating ellipse perimeter via AGM note: for FX-115MS, B = √AB means B = √(A*B) (01-23-2020 01:40 PM)Albert Chan Wrote:(01-21-2020 05:16 PM)Albert Chan Wrote: \(\large p(a,b) = 2× \left( p({a+b \over 2}, \sqrt{ab}) - {\pi a b \over AGM(a,b)}\right)\) |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
No multi-statement 991CW—It’s peculiar - Matt Agajanian - 08-20-2023, 08:49 PM
RE: No multi-statement 991CW—It’s peculiar - celltx - 08-25-2023, 06:45 PM
RE: No multi-statement 991CW—It’s peculiar - Matt Agajanian - 08-25-2023, 09:26 PM
RE: No multi-statement 991CW—It’s peculiar - Eddie W. Shore - 08-26-2023, 01:06 AM
RE: No multi-statement 991CW—It’s peculiar - toml_12953 - 08-26-2023, 04:35 AM
RE: No multi-statement 991CW—It’s peculiar - lrdheat - 08-26-2023, 05:48 PM
RE: No multi-statement 991CW—It’s peculiar - Albert Chan - 08-26-2023 06:36 PM
RE: No multi-statement 991CW—It’s peculiar - Matt Agajanian - 08-27-2023, 07:08 PM
RE: No multi-statement 991CW—It’s peculiar - lrdheat - 08-26-2023, 06:51 PM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)