Is there an algorithm for solar eclipse duration?
|
10-13-2023, 10:47 PM
(This post was last modified: 10-15-2023 09:45 PM by StephenG1CMZ.)
Post: #7
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Is there an algorithm for solar eclipse duration?
Thanks for the many interesting suggestions.
It seems like the Elements... book will be most useful, though it will take some time to get it. I have noticed something curious (perhaps a bug?) in my calculation of the eclipse magnitude (the fraction eclipsed, not brightness) for a solar eclipse. My calculation of this magnitude for the example used by Jean Meeus is OK (edition 2 formula 54.2, example 54.a). But my calculation for tomorrow's 14 October 2023 solar eclipse is 2.0, whereas online sources are giving a value of 0.9 - and of course one would expect a value less than 1 given the visible ring (although the calculation is not limited to 1). I am wondering whether this is a problem with the calculation, or a misunderstanding of categorisation. Jean Meeus states that the formula for the calculation for the solar eclipse applies to a partial eclipse. But the eclipse is categorised as an annular one. I would have assumed that an annular eclipse is obviously partial, but since the categorisation is "annular" not "partial" perhaps the formula should not be used? (implying a None should be returned rather than a number). [-My code lazily always returns a number even when total.] Or is the "partial" formula valid for annular eclipses too, in which case my calculation may be in error despite yielding a reasonable result for the example (1993 May 21) Update: Comparing several magnitudes for 1900-2023 with online values, it seems only partial solar magnitudes are valid using this formula - not annular, hybrid or total (but all lunar eclipse values are OK). Stephen Lewkowicz (G1CMZ) https://my.numworks.com/python/steveg1cmz |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)