AVars parsing bug or limitation
|
11-30-2023, 02:01 PM
Post: #3
|
|||
|
|||
RE: AVars parsing bug or limitation
(11-30-2023 06:09 AM)komame Wrote: ...I can report this to the bug tracker, but it's more of an enhancement request for PPL than a bug. However, as you've noticed yourself, it's not a major issue, so the likelihood of someone addressing it is unfortunately very low. Thanks, komame! When email to Moravia was greeted with silence, I realized the low likelihood. But I think reporting is worthwhile so that a complete bug list exists. Maybe all the world suddenly wants Primes and money starts rolling in. :-) I originally used the %e format to maintain proper number of significant figures in the app variable. However, it's easiest to avoid this bug by simply using %f. E.g., Code: cmd='AVars("loss_dB"):=%f' % loss_dB) |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
AVars parsing bug or limitation - ab3ap - 11-14-2023, 04:08 PM
RE: AVars parsing bug or limitation - komame - 11-30-2023, 06:09 AM
RE: AVars parsing bug or limitation - ab3ap - 11-30-2023 02:01 PM
RE: AVars parsing bug or limitation - ab3ap - 11-30-2023, 02:46 PM
RE: AVars parsing bug or limitation - Albert Chan - 11-30-2023, 03:31 PM
RE: AVars parsing bug or limitation - ab3ap - 11-30-2023, 03:58 PM
RE: AVars parsing bug or limitation - ab3ap - 12-01-2023, 01:43 PM
RE: AVars parsing bug or limitation - komame - 12-16-2023, 08:04 PM
RE: AVars parsing bug or limitation - ab3ap - 12-17-2023, 10:02 PM
RE: AVars parsing bug or limitation - komame - 03-28-2024, 07:06 AM
RE: AVars parsing bug or limitation - ab3ap - 03-28-2024, 12:13 PM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)