Is RPN still relevant?
|
12-18-2023, 11:54 AM
(This post was last modified: 12-18-2023 11:56 AM by Maximilian Hohmann.)
Post: #22
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Is RPN still relevant?
Hello!
(12-18-2023 07:56 AM)carey Wrote: ... and probably helps keeps a mind sharp into old age by engaging it to perform tasks that modern calculators can now perform on their own. This is the main advantage of RPN over everything else, calculator-wise, in my eyes too and beats crosswords and sudokus big time! I enjoy trying my luck at Valentin's calculator puzzles or those from the conferences posted here (usually weeks later and with little success, therefore I don't post results...). Most of them would be trivial to solve on a computer using any programming language or a modern calculator with CAS or a Rasperry Pi that comes with Mathematica, therefore these solutions are forbidden. But it is RPN and the very limited number of storage registers and program steps that turns them into a big challenge. Or, similar to how President Kennedy once phrased it: "We chose to solve our puzzles using RPN - not because it is easy but because it is hard!" :-) Regards Max (An algebraic person through and through, unafraid of parentheses and the equals sign...) |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)