Search
Member List
Calendar
Help
HP Forums
/
HP Calculators (and very old HP Computers)
/
General Forum 
/
Preferred Model for Quick Number Crunching
/
Preferred Model for Quick Number Crunching
| Poll: Best Model for Quick Number Crunching This poll is closed. |
|||
| HP 11C |    |
6 | 3.77% |
| HP 15C | |
33 | 20.75% |
| HP 32S | |
10 | 6.29% |
| HP 41C | |
16 | 10.06% |
| HP 42S | |
27 | 16.98% |
| HP 48S/G, HP 50G | |
28 | 17.61% |
| HP Prime | |
12 | 7.55% |
| Other | |
27 | 16.98% |
| Total | 159 votes | 100% | |
| * You voted for this item. | [Show Results] |
|
Preferred Model for Quick Number Crunching
|
|
02-08-2024, 10:34 PM
(This post was last modified: 02-08-2024 10:40 PM by Matt Agajanian.)
Post: #22
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Preferred Model for Quick Number Crunching
Now that they’re all smartphone-based, grabbing any model is a couple steps, I’m grabbing whatever my fingers click on.
In all seriousness though: Classic: 67 Woodstock: 25C Spice/Spike: 32E From Cuvee On a side note: (02-08-2024 03:23 AM)lrdheat Wrote: The CASIO fx-991-CW packs a lot into a small package, uses 17-21 significant digits in its calculations, requires using menus a bit more than the 42S. Shirt pocket size, but is prone to fall out of a shirt pocket, better in a pants pocket. Although the CW gets a ton of gruff, What are your thoughts about and pluses for the 991 CW? |
|||
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)