What is the correct result?

[Matt Agajanian]

(04-15-2024 11:06 AM)Maximilian Hohmann Wrote:  Hello!


1. Being sued does not make a brand non-reputable. Only being convicted. Google does not find any reference to lawsuits and no refrence to verdicts against Casio either. At least I could not find them using Google.

/quote]
...
[quote='Maximilian Hohmann' pid='186122' dateline='1713179173']

4. Sueing people and companies over trivialities is a very American thing (sorry to say that) and certainly not common "in multiple countries". In my part of the world, no court would even accept a lawsuit of someone complaing that a product behaves exactly as advertised. Even if the predecessor behaved differently. And even if someone would be accepted before court with such a claim, the case would not end with a verdict but with a judicial settlement instead. By which Casio will take back the calculator in question and reimburse the 25 Euros to the plaintiff, even if the unit is already out of warranty. The court costs and legal fees will be split in half, leaving the plaintiff with a four-figure bill over a 25 Euro calculator...

Regards
Max

NB: Of course I am still interested in those court cases in multiple countries if someone can find them!

Thanks for the extensive explanation.

Those quotes were from another Facebook member. That response was not mine. I don't know where that Facebook member got the info from.