TI Conditionals & Spaghetti Code

[Matt Agajanian]

(05-18-2024 11:46 PM)toml_12953 Wrote:  

(05-18-2024 10:25 PM)Matt Agajanian Wrote:  Hi all.

Yes, the TI library of Solid State Modules, Magnetic Cards, hundreds of Users Groups have contributed massive amounts of programs built around the SR-52, SR-56, and the 58/59 using conditionals with the automatic Go To for line numbers and labels.

But, wouldn’t the automatic transfer of a Go To instruction result in a scramble of program locations and execution flow instead of a well organized code?

I thought using Go To would just create a confusing path of programming and execution.

Don't believe everything Dijkstra says. Virtually every CPU eventually translates comparison instructions and loops into jumps. GOTO, like any programming instruction, can be misused but it can also be used to make the logic of a program clearer. Keep your code organized into one way in, one way out and GOTO doesn't get in the way at all.

Structured method:

Code:

DO
    <some code>
    x=x+1
LOOP UNTIL x>10

Using GOTO:

Code:

LBL A
    <some code>
    x=x+1
if x<=10 GOTO A

Sure, these are trivial examples but they illustrate they GOTO doesn't need to create spaghetti code. The meaning of both segments is pretty clear.

Yes, but these are structured loops. What about conditionals based on equations/formula results by themselves?