Post Reply 
Misued? Percent Information
05-24-2024, 10:46 AM (This post was last modified: 05-24-2024 07:15 PM by Albert Chan.)
Post: #3
RE: Misued? Percent Information
(05-23-2024 10:56 PM)SlideRule Wrote:  "in other words, 25% of the people who had negative tests with the previous detection
process actually had this specific cancer." Is this statement correct?

Technically, it is possible, but it is un-related to the new test.

carey's number, true cancer rate = 20%
Code:

                 | Positive   | Negative  Total
Cancer           |       0    |     20       20
No Cancer        |      20    |     60       80
       Total            20          80

False positive = 20/20 = 100%      // extremely bad test!
False negative = 20/80 = 25%
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
Misued? Percent Information - SlideRule - 05-23-2024, 10:56 PM
RE: Misued? Percent Information - carey - 05-24-2024, 01:15 AM
RE: Misued? Percent Information - Albert Chan - 05-24-2024 10:46 AM
RE: Misued? Percent Information - ttw - 05-25-2024, 04:57 PM



User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)