Post Reply 
Casio’s blunder? Or not?
06-09-2024, 08:39 PM
Post: #8
RE: Casio’s blunder? Or not?
(06-09-2024 07:12 PM)xerxes Wrote:  2^33 gives 8589934589

(08-13-2018 03:58 PM)Thomas Klemm Wrote:  So I tried to maximise the duration by using \(2^{33}=8,589,934,592\) but was slightly disappointed by the result:
Only disk 5?
Whereas I've expected 34.

Turned out the given result was \(8,589,934,605\) which is off by \(13\).
So I've entered the correct value manually.

Thus, in the years since the advent of the HP-25 they managed to bring the error down to 3.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
RE: Casio’s blunder? Or not? - xerxes - 06-09-2024, 07:12 PM
RE: Casio’s blunder? Or not? - EdS2 - 06-09-2024, 07:01 AM
RE: Casio’s blunder? Or not? - Thomas Klemm - 06-09-2024 08:39 PM
RE: Casio’s blunder? Or not? - thenozone - 06-12-2024, 11:47 AM



User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)