Casio’s blunder? Or not?
|
06-09-2024, 08:39 PM
Post: #8
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Casio’s blunder? Or not?
(06-09-2024 07:12 PM)xerxes Wrote: 2^33 gives 8589934589 (08-13-2018 03:58 PM)Thomas Klemm Wrote: So I tried to maximise the duration by using \(2^{33}=8,589,934,592\) but was slightly disappointed by the result: Thus, in the years since the advent of the HP-25 they managed to bring the error down to 3. |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)