TI-58/59 SBR question

[Thomas Okken]

(06-14-2024 10:30 AM)Maximilian Hohmann Wrote:  This gets better and better, we are very close to the human solutions presented above.

I don't see that. What I do see is that what is currently being hyped up as AI is completely lacking in intelligence. It is good at sounding smart, but only as long as you don't look too closely at what it spits out. In your example, the code isn't valid TI-59 code, the terms "step" and "label" are used as though they mean the same thing, and the line numbers make no sense. These aren't minor flaws that a bit of tweaking of the "AI" will overcome; they are bits of nonsense that demonstrate the complete lack of actual understanding in the system.