Looking for TVM contributions
|
06-17-2024, 09:03 PM
(This post was last modified: 06-17-2024 09:25 PM by robve.)
Post: #59
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Looking for TVM contributions
(06-17-2024 06:37 PM)SlideRule Wrote: from an unknown but astute source; Assuming TYPE is 0 for END and 1 for BGN, then we recognize PV and FV are switched and their signs inverted and N is inverted: PV*S + PMT*K*R/I + FV = 0 with K=1+B*I and R=EXPM1(-N*LNP1(I)) and S=R+1 Compare this to FV = (K*PMT*R/I-PV)/S K*PMT*R/I - PV - FV*S = 0 This gives the same TVM problem. EDIT: I just checked with the Hybrid solver: ./tvm 328 '?' 35000 -324 0 n=328.000000 pv=35000.000000 pmt=-324.000000 fv=0.000000 evals=6, I%=0.872056914834067998%, FVerror=1.3e-10 ./tvm -328 '?' 0 -324 -35000 n=-328.000000 pv=0.000000 pmt=-324.000000 fv=-35000.000000 evals=5,I%= 0.872056914834067887%, FVerror=0 So this aligns with the observation Albert made. - Rob "I count on old friends to remain rational" |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 8 Guest(s)