Probability Functions: order of arguments insanity
|
09-24-2014, 07:21 AM
Post: #7
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Probability Functions: order of arguments insanity
It's of course true if p and k have values, not if they are symbolic. There is no good solution anyway, since users will expect p as an optionnal 3rd argument to binomial(n,k) and will expect argument order consistency with binomial_cdf/icdf, whatever it means since the third arg has nothing to do with the k of binomial(n,k,p), you should see this k as a disappearing argument.
|
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
Probability Functions: order of arguments insanity - rkf - 09-12-2014, 04:55 AM
RE: Probability Functions: order of arguments insanity - parisse - 09-13-2014, 08:31 AM
RE: Probability Functions: order of arguments insanity - Primeoprime - 09-21-2014, 05:14 PM
RE: Probability Functions: order of arguments insanity - parisse - 09-23-2014, 06:45 AM
RE: Probability Functions: order of arguments insanity - rkf - 09-24-2014, 05:52 AM
RE: Probability Functions: order of arguments insanity - Michael - 09-21-2014, 09:23 PM
RE: Probability Functions: order of arguments insanity - parisse - 09-24-2014 07:21 AM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)