Another subtle HP-15C CE difference

[J-F Garnier]

(10-21-2024 01:40 PM)naddy Wrote:  I can't decide whether that's a bug or a feature. If you call label, the next step is always going to be LBL label. Showing it is redundant. The exception would be GSB I, although people hardly use that outside a program. However, the CE does show the target step for SOLVE label and ∫ label, where it is equally redundant.

I can think of a possible usage. Image you have multiple labels of the same name:

Code:

001 LBL A
002 2
003 *
004 R/S
005 LBL A
006 2
007 /
008 R/S

First GSB A will show step 001, next one will show step 005.

OK, it's an ad-hoc justification :-)

J-F