41CL/Time Module "Correct" doesn't?
|
09-26-2014, 09:27 PM
Post: #4
|
|||
|
|||
RE: 41CL/Time Module "Correct" doesn't?
(09-25-2014 09:43 PM)ColinJDenman Wrote: In my experience and recollection, the interval for correcting was never more than once a month and often several months. It might even recommend such a frequency in the manual. In the 41CX Owner's Manual (August 1983 English edition), Volume 2, page 238, it says "the time span between uses of CORRECT should be 1 week or more." Also, the entire Appendix F (pages 374-378) is about the clock's accuracy. The last footnote at the bottom of page 375 says, "The longer you wait to execute CORRECT, the smaller the error due to keystroke variation becomes in proportion to any error resulting from a combination of all error factors. A practical time span for many applications is 1 week." On the next page, it says "Remember that increasing the time span between execution of SETIME and CORRECT and execution of the next CORRECT will result in a more precise accuracy factor." <0|ΙΈ|0> -Joe- |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
41CL/Time Module "Correct" doesn't? - BobVA - 09-02-2014, 01:20 PM
RE: 41CL/Time Module "Correct" doesn't? - ColinJDenman - 09-25-2014, 09:43 PM
RE: 41CL/Time Module "Correct" doesn't? - Joe Horn - 09-26-2014 09:27 PM
RE: 41CL/Time Module "Correct" doesn't? - BobVA - 09-27-2014, 02:26 AM
RE: 41CL/Time Module "Correct" doesn't? - ColinJDenman - 09-27-2014, 07:20 AM
RE: 41CL/Time Module "Correct" doesn't? - BobVA - 09-26-2014, 03:01 AM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)