41CL/Time Module "Correct" doesn't?
|
09-27-2014, 02:26 AM
(This post was last modified: 09-28-2014 09:06 PM by BobVA.)
Post: #5
|
|||
|
|||
RE: 41CL/Time Module "Correct" doesn't?
(09-26-2014 09:27 PM)Joe Horn Wrote: ..."The longer you wait to execute CORRECT, the smaller the error due to keystroke variation becomes ... The time module manual also has an interesting footnote: Quote: Approximately +/- 0.1 second is the maximum keystroke precision for most users. You can reduce precision error by executing CORRECT as a function assigned to a key instead of by XEQ ALPHA CORRECT ALPHA. This is because the calculator takes less time to internally locate and execute a function assigned to a single key. Which is what I did. I'm not sure what effect the TURBO setting on the CL might have on this, but I believe the speedup is disabled for actions related to the keyboard, so I'm guessing none, regarding that particular delay. Bob |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
41CL/Time Module "Correct" doesn't? - BobVA - 09-02-2014, 01:20 PM
RE: 41CL/Time Module "Correct" doesn't? - ColinJDenman - 09-25-2014, 09:43 PM
RE: 41CL/Time Module "Correct" doesn't? - Joe Horn - 09-26-2014, 09:27 PM
RE: 41CL/Time Module "Correct" doesn't? - BobVA - 09-27-2014 02:26 AM
RE: 41CL/Time Module "Correct" doesn't? - ColinJDenman - 09-27-2014, 07:20 AM
RE: 41CL/Time Module "Correct" doesn't? - BobVA - 09-26-2014, 03:01 AM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)