Post Reply 
Algorithm accuracy vs calculator precision
11-12-2024, 09:12 PM (This post was last modified: 11-12-2024 09:20 PM by Commie.)
Post: #11
RE: Algorithm accuracy vs calculator precision
(11-12-2024 08:58 PM)Thomas Klemm Wrote:  The classic HP calculators use the CORDIC algorithm.
The main reason was that only addition and shift was available.

Ha, I was waiting for someone to pull me up with cordics, I have studied cordics extensively and put it head to head against poly's and the end results are more or less the same, in fact, poly's are faster unless you are using fpga based on shift add logic, there is no benefit using cordics over poly's.

Cordics in a microcontroller are slow but use less code(many iterations), poly's are faster but use greater code length.

Cheers
Darren
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
RE: Algorithm accuracy vs calculator precision - Commie - 11-12-2024 09:12 PM



User(s) browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)