No σ for you!
|
Yesterday, 01:09 PM
Post: #25
|
|||
|
|||
RE: No σ for you!
(11-25-2024 04:49 PM)carey Wrote: \[ OT, I find standard normal (µ=0, σ=1) less confusing. Above f(x) has unit of 1/σ, but pdf(z) is dimensionless. pdf(z) := exp(-z*z/2) / sqrt(2*pi) , where z = (x-µ)/σ Dimensionless equation is better. More compact, and *only* 1 shape We have a rough idea of probability without calculations, 68–95–99.7 rule Also, with standard normal, we can solve for missing µ, σ |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
No σ for you! - naddy - 11-21-2024, 03:51 PM
RE: No σ for you! - KeithB - 11-21-2024, 04:08 PM
RE: No σ for you! - AnnoyedOne - 11-21-2024, 04:48 PM
RE: No σ for you! - KeithB - 11-21-2024, 06:02 PM
RE: No σ for you! - rprosperi - 11-22-2024, 01:07 PM
RE: No σ for you! - Paul Dale - 11-21-2024, 09:41 PM
RE: No σ for you! - Albert Chan - 11-21-2024, 10:03 PM
RE: No σ for you! - KeithB - 11-22-2024, 02:27 PM
RE: No σ for you! - KeithB - 11-22-2024, 02:54 PM
RE: No σ for you! - carey - 11-23-2024, 08:09 AM
RE: No σ for you! - Albert Chan - 11-23-2024, 12:38 PM
RE: No σ for you! - HPing - 11-24-2024, 06:48 PM
RE: No σ for you! - Albert Chan - 11-24-2024, 08:59 PM
RE: No σ for you! - Nihotte(lma) - 11-24-2024, 06:00 PM
RE: No σ for you! - naddy - 11-24-2024, 07:13 PM
RE: No σ for you! - dm319 - 11-25-2024, 12:54 PM
RE: No σ for you! - carey - 11-25-2024, 03:58 PM
RE: No σ for you! - EdS2 - 11-25-2024, 04:01 PM
RE: No σ for you! - carey - 11-25-2024, 04:49 PM
RE: No σ for you! - dm319 - 11-26-2024, 08:12 PM
RE: No σ for you! - dm319 - 11-26-2024, 10:58 PM
RE: No σ for you! - carey - Yesterday, 12:53 AM
RE: No σ for you! - Albert Chan - Yesterday, 01:04 AM
RE: No σ for you! - Albert Chan - Yesterday 01:09 PM
RE: No σ for you! - carey - Yesterday, 06:17 PM
RE: No σ for you! - KeithB - 11-25-2024, 05:54 PM
RE: No σ for you! - dm319 - Yesterday, 07:56 PM
RE: No σ for you! - carey - Yesterday, 08:52 PM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 6 Guest(s)