Post Reply 
Yet another pandigital approximation (just for fun)
10-01-2014, 03:50 AM
Post: #19
RE: Yet another pandigital approximation (just for fun)
(10-01-2014 02:33 AM)rprosperi Wrote:  I don't follow much of the math you guys discuss, so.... why is this expressed in the format shown, since the fraction reduces to 10691 / 462?

The numbers are palindromic -- i.e. they read the same forwards as they do backwards.


Pauli
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
RE: Yet another pandigital approximation (just for fun) - Paul Dale - 10-01-2014 03:50 AM



User(s) browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)