Set theory (operators)
|
10-22-2014, 03:36 AM
Post: #2
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Set theory (operators)
(10-21-2014 04:15 PM)DrD Wrote: There might be a way to express UNION and INTERSECTION (U or ∩) using set theory notation in lieu of logical operator notation (AND / OR), for example. If so, I don't know how it is implemented. The commands are union() and intersect(). union( {1,2}, {1,2,3} ) or {1,2} union {1,2,3} will both produce the result [ 1 2 3 ] The intersect() command works similarly. Graph 3D | QPI | SolveSys |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
Set theory (operators) - DrD - 10-21-2014, 04:15 PM
RE: Set theory (operators) - Han - 10-22-2014 03:36 AM
RE: Set theory (operators) - DrD - 10-22-2014, 11:01 AM
RE: Set theory (operators) - Joe Horn - 10-23-2014, 08:25 AM
RE: Set theory (operators) - Alberto Candel - 10-22-2014, 03:22 PM
RE: Set theory (operators) - dbbotkin - 10-24-2014, 01:57 AM
RE: Set theory (operators) - Joe Horn - 10-24-2014, 03:57 AM
RE: Set theory (operators) - Alberto Candel - 10-24-2014, 04:26 AM
RE: Set theory (operators) - Joe Horn - 10-24-2014, 02:43 PM
RE: Set theory (operators) - DrD - 10-24-2014, 10:39 AM
RE: Set theory (operators) - DrD - 10-24-2014, 05:31 PM
RE: Set theory (operators) - parisse - 10-24-2014, 08:39 PM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)