WP 34S and 31S bugs and fixes

[Bit]

(01-25-2015 05:54 PM)walter b Wrote:  

(01-25-2015 05:50 PM)Bit Wrote:  The NOP refers to the what I quoted below. [->] [g] [g] results in [->] alone so [f] or [g] can follow, but [->] alone isn't defined as far as I can see. Isn't that what you wanted?

What I meant was:

• [->]+[g] results in [->][g][g] = [->] alone - prefixes [f] or [g] may follow [->] then.

d:-)

That's exactly what happens.

But you didn't specify what should happen when something else than [f] or [g] follows, so I took the route that was the simplest to implement: anything else cancels the arrow, i.e. it's effectively a NOP.