(35S) yet another R<>P Conversion
|
01-25-2015, 11:39 PM
Post: #5
|
|||
|
|||
RE: HP35s yet another R<>P Conversion
(01-25-2015 11:34 PM)MarkHaysHarris777 Wrote: Paul, how do you want LASTx to work with this type of routine; which LASTx should be left in the LASTx register. i know the definition of "value of x just before the last operation" but that definition really depends on the *operations* defined for LASTx. I can think of several ways to make sense of LASTx with a complex decomposition routine. Just wondering what your take was. Thanks. I think this nails does the reasoning for not doing it pretty well. Pauli |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
(35S) yet another R<>P Conversion - MarkHaysHarris777 - 01-25-2015, 09:12 AM
RE: HP35s yet another R<>P Conversion - Thomas Klemm - 01-25-2015, 12:27 PM
RE: HP35s yet another R<>P Conversion - Paul Dale - 01-25-2015, 10:07 PM
RE: HP35s yet another R<>P Conversion - MarkHaysHarris777 - 01-25-2015, 11:34 PM
RE: HP35s yet another R<>P Conversion - Paul Dale - 01-25-2015 11:39 PM
RE: HP35s yet another R<>P Conversion - MarkHaysHarris777 - 01-26-2015, 12:38 AM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)