Most underrated programmables

[Gerald H]

(02-07-2015 02:36 AM)rprosperi Wrote:  

(02-07-2015 01:11 AM)Hlib Wrote:  I speak about things which are known. And if tens hours of my operation suddenly disappeared from memory in 39gii, it not fairy tales. BTW, nobody tells about 39gii. There can be it "underrated programmables" too?
Mark, take it easy

No one here doubts that these are known facts. Some shortcomings of the 39gii are fairly well known, and it was clearly not a very succesful model. The point is that we get that you don't like it. You've written it many, many times. The fact that more people don't agree with your posts, imho, is due to the nature of the members here. People come here because they like HP calculator products and they like to talk about them, learn about them, share information about them, etc. Being loudly negative among a group of people that are here to be postive likely means you will not get a lot of support, nor should you expect it.

Constructive criticism is useful and common here, it helps others learn and may even help HP to improve products. Criticism just to complain helps no one. You are of course entitled to your view, just don't be surprised or angry if others here don't support your repetitive rants. My comments are not intended to offend, only to help you understand. I hope they did that.

Postings overly praising various models greatly outweigh negative comments on this forum.

Comments such as "I want to love this calculator" irritate me - surely it's a pleasant experience using the machine or not & you shouldn't ditch your critical faculties.

I find Hlib's comments in line with the title of the thread.

I also agree on the uselessness of the HP 38G & all it's descendents.