Post Reply 
Simulating 15C RAN # on 35s
02-15-2015, 12:54 PM
Post: #13
RE: Simulating 15C RAN # on 35s
(02-15-2015 12:01 PM)Tugdual Wrote:  I wonder how exactly faster RPN would be.

The equation has to be parsed each time it's executed. You can even enter an expression that leads to a SYNTAX ERROR like:
Code:
SQRT(
With the HP-48 this is not possible as the algebraic expression is parsed and stored in a compiled format. From this the algebraic expression is recreated for the display. That's why entering something like '(A+B)' with superfluous parentheses results just in 'A+B'.

But unless the same equation is evaluated again and again in a loop as in SOLVE or \(\int\) you probably never notice the difference.

Cheers
Thomas
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
Simulating 15C RAN # on 35s - Tugdual - 02-14-2015, 05:13 PM
RE: Simulating 15C RAN # on 35s - Namir - 02-15-2015, 03:44 AM
RE: Simulating 15C RAN # on 35s - Tugdual - 02-15-2015, 04:01 AM
RE: Simulating 15C RAN # on 35s - Tugdual - 02-15-2015, 03:45 PM
RE: Simulating 15C RAN # on 35s - Tugdual - 02-15-2015, 08:03 AM
RE: Simulating 15C RAN # on 35s - Tugdual - 02-15-2015, 10:37 AM
RE: Simulating 15C RAN # on 35s - Tugdual - 02-15-2015, 11:42 AM
RE: Simulating 15C RAN # on 35s - Tugdual - 02-15-2015, 12:01 PM
RE: Simulating 15C RAN # on 35s - Thomas Klemm - 02-15-2015 12:54 PM
RE: Simulating 15C RAN # on 35s - Tugdual - 02-15-2015, 05:17 PM



User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)