HP35s Revisited Bug # 14
|
02-21-2015, 07:51 PM
(This post was last modified: 02-21-2015 08:01 PM by Tugdual.)
Post: #9
|
|||
|
|||
RE: HP35s Revisited Bug # 14
Ok, I've got it.
31.32309 = -R*X/(-466.92696*Q-R) So basically, the 35s is picking the last result instead of the second "RCL X" and we can assume that "-R*X/(X*Q-R)" is evaluated with the equivalent RPN (very flat RPN but the I believe it is by design to avoid the use of a stack): Code: RCL X Another fun test. Enter the EQN: Code: -R*156.25/(X*1.77951304201-208.333333334) Now pay attention, execute the EQN a second time. The 35s will ask for R?... skip X? and returns 31.32309. Extremely odd bug because it also depends on values. With X=156.1 there is no problem... I wonder if the calculator somehow forgets to acknowledge that the former calculation was completed. May be there is a carry over or a precision issue and it leaves the calculation in an incomplete state and the next one restarts from its last value. |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
HP35s Revisited Bug # 14 - MarkHaysHarris777 - 02-21-2015, 07:17 AM
RE: HP35s Revisited Bug # 14 - Tugdual - 02-21-2015, 08:45 AM
RE: HP35s Revisited Bug # 14 - MarkHaysHarris777 - 02-21-2015, 06:08 PM
RE: HP35s Revisited Bug # 14 - Thomas Ritschel - 02-21-2015, 07:14 PM
RE: HP35s Revisited Bug # 14 - Thomas Klemm - 02-21-2015, 08:59 AM
RE: HP35s Revisited Bug # 14 - Thomas Ritschel - 02-21-2015, 10:21 AM
RE: HP35s Revisited Bug # 14 - MarkHaysHarris777 - 02-21-2015, 06:05 PM
RE: HP35s Revisited Bug # 14 - Tugdual - 02-21-2015, 11:24 AM
RE: HP35s Revisited Bug # 14 - Tugdual - 02-21-2015 07:51 PM
RE: HP35s Revisited Bug # 14 - Thomas Ritschel - 02-21-2015, 08:28 PM
RE: HP35s Revisited Bug # 14 - Tugdual - 02-21-2015, 09:11 PM
RE: HP35s Revisited Bug # 14 - Thomas Ritschel - 02-21-2015, 10:33 PM
RE: HP35s Revisited Bug # 14 - Thomas Ritschel - 02-22-2015, 05:41 PM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)