Post Reply 
HP35s Revisited Bug # 14
02-21-2015, 07:51 PM (This post was last modified: 02-21-2015 08:01 PM by Tugdual.)
Post: #9
RE: HP35s Revisited Bug # 14
Ok, I've got it.

31.32309 = -R*X/(-466.92696*Q-R)

So basically, the 35s is picking the last result instead of the second "RCL X" and we can assume that "-R*X/(X*Q-R)" is evaluated with the equivalent RPN (very flat RPN but the I believe it is by design to avoid the use of a stack):
Code:
RCL X
RCL Q
*
RCL R
-
1/x
RCL R
*
RCL X
*
CHS

Another fun test.
Enter the EQN:
Code:
-R*156.25/(X*1.77951304201-208.333333334)
First attempt, the 35s asks for R?, then X? and returns -466.92696
Now pay attention, execute the EQN a second time. The 35s will ask for R?... skip X? and returns 31.32309.

Extremely odd bug because it also depends on values. With X=156.1 there is no problem... I wonder if the calculator somehow forgets to acknowledge that the former calculation was completed. May be there is a carry over or a precision issue and it leaves the calculation in an incomplete state and the next one restarts from its last value.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
RE: HP35s Revisited Bug # 14 - Tugdual - 02-21-2015, 08:45 AM
RE: HP35s Revisited Bug # 14 - Tugdual - 02-21-2015, 11:24 AM
RE: HP35s Revisited Bug # 14 - Tugdual - 02-21-2015 07:51 PM
RE: HP35s Revisited Bug # 14 - Tugdual - 02-21-2015, 09:11 PM



User(s) browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)