HP35s Revisited Bug # 14
|
02-21-2015, 10:33 PM
(This post was last modified: 02-21-2015 10:35 PM by Thomas Ritschel.)
Post: #12
|
|||
|
|||
RE: HP35s Revisited Bug # 14
(02-21-2015 09:11 PM)Tugdual Wrote: Hmm would it be related to opening parenthesis? Seems to be. I played with using different equations for the second step. First EQN is yours: Code: -R*156.25/(X*1.77951304201-208.333333334) And then, for example, this as the second equation (using A=1, B=2, C=3): Code: -A*2*(B*C-1)+B If this second equation is run alone, then it asks for A, B, and C (in this order) and correctly returns -8. Obviously the equations are evaluated from left to right. Let's change the second equation into this one: Code: -A*2*(B*C-1)+(B) Quite obviously related to the use of parentheses... |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
HP35s Revisited Bug # 14 - MarkHaysHarris777 - 02-21-2015, 07:17 AM
RE: HP35s Revisited Bug # 14 - Tugdual - 02-21-2015, 08:45 AM
RE: HP35s Revisited Bug # 14 - MarkHaysHarris777 - 02-21-2015, 06:08 PM
RE: HP35s Revisited Bug # 14 - Thomas Ritschel - 02-21-2015, 07:14 PM
RE: HP35s Revisited Bug # 14 - Thomas Klemm - 02-21-2015, 08:59 AM
RE: HP35s Revisited Bug # 14 - Thomas Ritschel - 02-21-2015, 10:21 AM
RE: HP35s Revisited Bug # 14 - MarkHaysHarris777 - 02-21-2015, 06:05 PM
RE: HP35s Revisited Bug # 14 - Tugdual - 02-21-2015, 11:24 AM
RE: HP35s Revisited Bug # 14 - Tugdual - 02-21-2015, 07:51 PM
RE: HP35s Revisited Bug # 14 - Thomas Ritschel - 02-21-2015, 08:28 PM
RE: HP35s Revisited Bug # 14 - Tugdual - 02-21-2015, 09:11 PM
RE: HP35s Revisited Bug # 14 - Thomas Ritschel - 02-21-2015 10:33 PM
RE: HP35s Revisited Bug # 14 - Thomas Ritschel - 02-22-2015, 05:41 PM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)