How to solve ncdf(X, 0.76, 83, 1E99) = 0.15 (RESOLVED)
|
04-28-2015, 06:28 AM
Post: #8
|
|||
|
|||
RE: How to solve ncdf(X, 0.76, 83, 1E99) = 0.15
(04-27-2015 08:18 PM)CR Haeger Wrote: The Prime can solve directly for x with: NORMALD_ICDF(83,0.76,0.15) Great. But why then would one want to determine a quantile by solving the CDF? Sounds a bit like calculating sqrt(2) by solving x²–2 = 0. #-) But maybe I didn't get the essential point here... (04-27-2015 08:18 PM)CR Haeger Wrote: In this example, the WP34S used ~16-19 keystrokes depending on PROB menu navigation. The Prime takes ~14 or more depending on having to go to the on-board HELP to guide the syntax to use. On the 34s I would actually do it this way: ,15 g Φ–1 ,76 x 83 + => 82,21231... That's 12 keystrokes. And no need to consult the manual to find out where to store µ and σ. ;-) Dieter Dieter |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
How to solve ncdf(X, 0.76, 83, 1E99) = 0.15 (RESOLVED) - StephanP - 04-27-2015, 01:41 PM
RE: How to solve ncdf(X, 0.76, 83, 1E99) = 0.15 - Tim Wessman - 04-27-2015, 02:33 PM
RE: How to solve ncdf(X, 0.76, 83, 1E99) = 0.15 - Dieter - 04-28-2015, 06:32 AM
RE: How to solve ncdf(X, 0.76, 83, 1E99) = 0.15 - StephanP - 04-27-2015, 02:43 PM
RE: How to solve ncdf(X, 0.76, 83, 1E99) = 0.15 - StephanP - 04-27-2015, 02:47 PM
RE: How to solve ncdf(X, 0.76, 83, 1E99) = 0.15 - CR Haeger - 04-27-2015, 05:02 PM
RE: How to solve ncdf(X, 0.76, 83, 1E99) = 0.15 - Dieter - 04-27-2015, 07:23 PM
RE: How to solve ncdf(X, 0.76, 83, 1E99) = 0.15 - CR Haeger - 04-27-2015, 08:18 PM
RE: How to solve ncdf(X, 0.76, 83, 1E99) = 0.15 - Dieter - 04-28-2015 06:28 AM
RE: How to solve ncdf(X, 0.76, 83, 1E99) = 0.15 - CR Haeger - 04-28-2015, 11:32 AM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)