Post Reply 
A case against the x<>y key
05-10-2015, 03:12 PM (This post was last modified: 05-10-2015 08:16 PM by Mark Hardman.)
Post: #16
RE: A case against the x<>y key
(05-10-2015 02:32 PM)hansklav Wrote:  True, but my reply was to Mark Hardman’s post, who started the whole calculation from the left side, and then a 4-level stack will not suffice.

Again, you've written an RPN tutorial!?!

Code:
              x          y          z          t
1 [Enter]     1          -          -          -
3 [Enter]     3          1          -          -
4             4          3          1          -
y^x          81          1          -          -
2             2         81          1          -
x           162          1          -          -
5             5        162          1          -
/            32.4        1          -          -
-           -31.4        -          -          -
6 [Enter]     6        -31.4        -          -
7             7          6        -31.4        -
x^2          49          6        -31.4        -
3             3         49          6        -31.4
1/x           0.3333    49          6        -31.4
y^x           3.6593     6        -31.4      -31.4
-             2.3407   -31.4      -31.4      -31.4
sin           0.0408   -31.4      -31.4      -31.4
8             8          0.0408   -31.4      -31.4
x!        40320          0.0408   -31.4      -31.4
x          1646.7276   -31.4      -31.4      -31.4
+          1615.3276   -31.4      -31.4      -31.4
45 [Enter]   45       1615.3276   -31.4      -31.4
6  [Enter]    6         45       1615.3276   -31.4
7             7          6         45       1615.3276
/             0.8571    45       1615.3276  1615.3276
y^x          26.1240  1615.3276  1615.3276  1615.3276
2 [Enter]     2         26.1240  1615.3276  1615.3276
3             3          2         26.1240  1615.3276
y^x           8         26.1240  1615.3276  1615.3276
9 [Chs]      -9          8         26.1240  1615.3276
x<>y          8         -9         26.1240  1615.3276
y^x        4.3047e07    26.1240  1615.3276  1615.3276
x          1.1246e09  1615.3276  1615.3276  1615.3276
x^2        1.2646e18  1615.3276  1615.3276  1615.3276
ln        41.6813     1615.3276  1615.3276  1615.3276
+       1657.0089     1615.3276  1615.3276  1615.3276

Ceci n'est pas une signature.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
A case against the x<>y key - hansklav - 05-09-2015, 10:49 PM
RE: A case against the x<>y key - Les Bell - 05-10-2015, 12:56 AM
RE: A case against the x<>y key - hansklav - 05-10-2015, 10:25 AM
RE: A case against the x<>y key - hansklav - 05-10-2015, 10:37 AM
RE: A case against the x<>y key - hansklav - 05-10-2015, 10:43 AM
RE: A case against the x<>y key - hansklav - 05-10-2015, 02:32 PM
RE: A case against the x<>y key - Mark Hardman - 05-10-2015 03:12 PM
RE: A case against the x<>y key - hansklav - 05-10-2015, 03:51 PM
RE: A case against the x<>y key - hansklav - 05-11-2015, 12:09 AM
RE: A case against the x<>y key - Les Bell - 05-11-2015, 12:24 AM
RE: A case against the x<>y key - Les Bell - 05-11-2015, 12:20 AM
RE: A case against the x<>y key - Tugdual - 05-10-2015, 04:06 AM
RE: A case against the x<>y key - d b - 05-10-2015, 05:16 AM
RE: A case against the x<>y key - hansklav - 05-10-2015, 10:59 AM
RE: A case against the x<>y key - hansklav - 05-10-2015, 09:37 PM
RE: A case against the x<>y key - Les Bell - 05-11-2015, 03:39 AM
RE: A case against the x<>y key - hansklav - 05-11-2015, 09:41 PM
RE: A case against the x<>y key - Les Bell - 05-11-2015, 04:18 AM
RE: A case against the x<>y key - Les Bell - 05-11-2015, 06:10 AM
RE: A case against the x<>y key - RMollov - 05-11-2015, 09:49 AM
RE: A case against the x<>y key - Les Bell - 05-11-2015, 10:27 PM
RE: A case against the x<>y key - hansklav - 05-17-2015, 10:49 PM
RE: A case against the x<>y key - d b - 05-12-2015, 12:35 AM
RE: A case against the x<>y key - Les Bell - 05-12-2015, 01:41 AM



User(s) browsing this thread: 9 Guest(s)