A case against the x<>y key
|
05-11-2015, 03:23 AM
Post: #31
|
|||
|
|||
RE: A case against the x<>y key
(05-11-2015 12:09 AM)hansklav Wrote: One method is to look carefully to the structure of the calculation to see if doing things backwards can be avoided at all. That is Thomas Klemm’s strategy. Not sure what you refer to. I just pointed out that \(-9^{2^3}\) is equal to \(-(9^{2^3})\) and not \((-9)^{2^3}\). The fact that Mark corrected the superfluous ENTER but not the false position of CHS irritates me a little. Cheers Thomas |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)