A case against the x<>y key

Threaded Mode | Linear Mode

A case against the x<>y key

05-11-2015, 03:49 AM

Post: #33

Thomas Klemm Offline

Senior Member

Posts: 2,303
Joined: Dec 2013

RE: A case against the x<>y key

(05-11-2015 03:39 AM)Les Bell Wrote: the problem is the ambiguity of "conventional" algebraic notation, which doesn't exist in RPN.

There's nothing ambiguous in the notation of \(-9^{2^3}\).

Kind regards
Thomas

« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Messages In This Thread

A case against the x<>y key - hansklav - 05-09-2015, 10:49 PM

RE: A case against the x<>y key - Les Bell - 05-10-2015, 12:56 AM

RE: A case against the x<>y key - hansklav - 05-10-2015, 10:25 AM

RE: A case against the x<>y key - Thomas Radtke - 05-10-2015, 12:35 PM

RE: A case against the x<>y key - Paul Dale - 05-10-2015, 01:13 AM

RE: A case against the x<>y key - hansklav - 05-10-2015, 10:37 AM

RE: A case against the x<>y key - Mark Hardman - 05-10-2015, 02:20 AM

RE: A case against the x<>y key - hansklav - 05-10-2015, 10:43 AM

RE: A case against the x<>y key - Thomas Radtke - 05-10-2015, 12:49 PM

RE: A case against the x<>y key - hansklav - 05-10-2015, 02:32 PM

RE: A case against the x<>y key - Thomas Radtke - 05-10-2015, 03:02 PM

RE: A case against the x<>y key - Mark Hardman - 05-10-2015, 03:12 PM

RE: A case against the x<>y key - hansklav - 05-10-2015, 03:51 PM

RE: A case against the x<>y key - Mark Hardman - 05-10-2015, 08:51 PM

RE: A case against the x<>y key - hansklav - 05-11-2015, 12:09 AM

RE: A case against the x<>y key - Les Bell - 05-11-2015, 12:24 AM

RE: A case against the x<>y key - Massimo Gnerucci - 05-10-2015, 04:10 PM

RE: A case against the x<>y key - Paul Dale - 05-10-2015, 09:55 PM

RE: A case against the x<>y key - J-F Garnier - 05-10-2015, 03:48 PM

RE: A case against the x<>y key - Mark Hardman - 05-10-2015, 02:32 PM

RE: A case against the x<>y key - Les Bell - 05-11-2015, 12:20 AM

RE: A case against the x<>y key - Tugdual - 05-10-2015, 04:06 AM

RE: A case against the x<>y key - d b - 05-10-2015, 05:16 AM

RE: A case against the x<>y key - hansklav - 05-10-2015, 10:59 AM

RE: A case against the x<>y key - Thomas Klemm - 05-10-2015, 06:49 PM

RE: A case against the x<>y key - Mark Hardman - 05-10-2015, 08:14 PM

RE: A case against the x<>y key - Steve Simpkin - 05-10-2015, 09:32 PM

RE: A case against the x<>y key - Mark Hardman - 05-10-2015, 09:44 PM

RE: A case against the x<>y key - Steve Simpkin - 05-10-2015, 11:01 PM

RE: A case against the x<>y key - hansklav - 05-10-2015, 09:37 PM

RE: A case against the x<>y key - Thomas Klemm - 05-11-2015, 03:23 AM

RE: A case against the x<>y key - Les Bell - 05-11-2015, 03:39 AM

RE: A case against the x<>y key - hansklav - 05-11-2015, 09:41 PM

RE: A case against the x<>y key - Thomas Klemm - 05-11-2015 03:49 AM

RE: A case against the x<>y key - Les Bell - 05-11-2015, 04:18 AM

RE: A case against the x<>y key - Thomas Klemm - 05-11-2015, 05:07 AM

RE: A case against the x<>y key - Les Bell - 05-11-2015, 06:10 AM

RE: A case against the x<>y key - RMollov - 05-11-2015, 09:49 AM

RE: A case against the x<>y key - Dave Britten - 05-11-2015, 12:30 PM

RE: A case against the x<>y key - Don Shepherd - 05-11-2015, 02:16 PM

RE: A case against the x<>y key - Massimo Gnerucci - 05-11-2015, 03:59 PM

RE: A case against the x<>y key - Les Bell - 05-11-2015, 10:27 PM

RE: A case against the x<>y key - hansklav - 05-17-2015, 10:49 PM

RE: A case against the x<>y key - Thomas Klemm - 05-11-2015, 10:10 PM

RE: A case against the x<>y key - d b - 05-12-2015, 12:35 AM

RE: A case against the x<>y key - Dave Britten - 05-12-2015, 01:07 AM

RE: A case against the x<>y key - Les Bell - 05-12-2015, 01:41 AM

RE: A case against the x<>y key - Dwight Sturrock - 05-12-2015, 11:39 PM

RE: A case against the x<>y key - Thomas Klemm - 05-18-2015, 08:35 PM

RE: A case against the x<>y key - Thomas Klemm - 05-18-2015, 10:06 PM

User(s) browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)