A case against the x<>y key
|
05-12-2015, 01:41 AM
Post: #46
|
|||
|
|||
RE: A case against the x<>y key
(05-12-2015 12:35 AM)Den Belillo (Martinez Ca.) Wrote: Les; Did your Sinclair suffer from less that optimally de-bounced keys and battery wiggle power off too? Mine does, but on the other hand, the screen is a nice color. Probably - it was a long time ago. When I first built it, it didn't work at all, but I accidentally discovered that freezing it got it going, so I used to put it in the freezer, set up a control systems problem (Routh-Horwitz, etc.) then pull it out and run the numbers as fast as possible before the calculator warmed up and stopped working. It turned out to be a faulty clock generator circuit - TI supplied a batch of faulty chips - and Sinclair Radionics reworked it. But it was so limited that it only served to make me save hard for that HP-45, and so I didn't use it for much longer. I've no idea what happened to it, but I don't really miss it much. --- Les [http://www.lesbell.com.au] |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 10 Guest(s)