newRPL: Simplified matrices proposal
|
06-05-2015, 11:41 PM
Post: #9
|
|||
|
|||
RE: newRPL: Simplified matrices proposal
(06-03-2015 01:21 PM)Claudio L. Wrote: Overall, I think the compatibility impact on existing code is very minimum. Worst case, the user will have to manually change all symbolic matrices to square brackets, but even that could be solved transparently (with a speed penalty, of course). Thanks for the feedback. From the upper discussion, it appeared to me that the impacts would be more significant. Hopefully, the conflict is limited to the cases you described. It would be best if NewRPL could suggest the appropriate change when encountering the original syntax, as most folks will no doubt simply try to feed existing code to NewRPL without manually pre-screening and modifying the code first. --Bob Prosperi |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
newRPL: Simplified matrices proposal - Claudio L. - 06-01-2015, 07:20 PM
RE: newRPL: Simplified matrices proposal - Werner - 06-01-2015, 08:48 PM
RE: newRPL: Simplified matrices proposal - Claudio L. - 06-02-2015, 12:46 AM
RE: newRPL: Simplified matrices proposal - Paul Dale - 06-01-2015, 10:24 PM
RE: newRPL: Simplified matrices proposal - Claudio L. - 06-02-2015, 01:37 AM
RE: newRPL: Simplified matrices proposal - Claudio L. - 06-02-2015, 12:19 PM
RE: newRPL: Simplified matrices proposal - rprosperi - 06-03-2015, 01:27 AM
RE: newRPL: Simplified matrices proposal - Claudio L. - 06-03-2015, 01:21 PM
RE: newRPL: Simplified matrices proposal - rprosperi - 06-05-2015 11:41 PM
RE: newRPL: Simplified matrices proposal - Claudio L. - 06-08-2015, 12:50 PM
RE: newRPL: Simplified matrices proposal - 3298 - 06-08-2015, 04:39 PM
RE: newRPL: Simplified matrices proposal - Claudio L. - 06-08-2015, 06:16 PM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)