Bug in fsolve()?
|
09-09-2015, 03:32 PM
Post: #2
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Bug in fsolve()?
Clearly, no positive roots exist for this function, and no negative roots less than -40 or so, so why keep expanding the search bracket?
fsolve() works fine with limits specified as -50 and 0. No matter what algorithm you choose, numerical root finding depends to a high degree on your starting guesses. |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
Bug in fsolve()? - MrMcChicken - 09-09-2015, 09:28 AM
RE: Bug in fsolve()? - Helge Gabert - 09-09-2015 03:32 PM
RE: Bug in fsolve()? - Tim Wessman - 09-09-2015, 03:42 PM
RE: Bug in fsolve()? - MrMcChicken - 09-10-2015, 07:12 PM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)