Post Reply 
Bug in fsolve()?
09-09-2015, 03:32 PM
Post: #2
RE: Bug in fsolve()?
Clearly, no positive roots exist for this function, and no negative roots less than -40 or so, so why keep expanding the search bracket?

fsolve() works fine with limits specified as -50 and 0.

No matter what algorithm you choose, numerical root finding depends to a high degree on your starting guesses.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
Bug in fsolve()? - MrMcChicken - 09-09-2015, 09:28 AM
RE: Bug in fsolve()? - Helge Gabert - 09-09-2015 03:32 PM
RE: Bug in fsolve()? - Tim Wessman - 09-09-2015, 03:42 PM
RE: Bug in fsolve()? - MrMcChicken - 09-10-2015, 07:12 PM



User(s) browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)