Post Reply 
Gamma Function by Stieltjes Continued Fraction
09-10-2015, 10:51 PM
Post: #12
RE: Gamma Function by Stieltjes Continued Fraction
(09-09-2015 09:21 PM)Dieter Wrote:  Setting the threshold to 9 and replacing the 5 with 5,00005 will even limit the error to ~2 E–12. But this requires much more precision than the 41 can provide.

Nonetheless, Dieter, this proves to be a great refinement and I have incorporated it and have changed the two lines in question in the version I now use. I doesn't add any lines or use much more memory. There seems to be minimal impact on speed too. This will work also for a port to the 67/97, but there aren't enough lines in the 25 or 33E/C to accommodate it.

Thank you!

Les
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
RE: Gamma Function by Stieltjes Continued Fraction - lcwright1964 - 09-10-2015 10:51 PM



User(s) browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)