Gamma Function by Stieltjes Continued Fraction
|
09-10-2015, 10:51 PM
Post: #12
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Gamma Function by Stieltjes Continued Fraction
(09-09-2015 09:21 PM)Dieter Wrote: Setting the threshold to 9 and replacing the 5 with 5,00005 will even limit the error to ~2 E–12. But this requires much more precision than the 41 can provide. Nonetheless, Dieter, this proves to be a great refinement and I have incorporated it and have changed the two lines in question in the version I now use. I doesn't add any lines or use much more memory. There seems to be minimal impact on speed too. This will work also for a port to the 67/97, but there aren't enough lines in the 25 or 33E/C to accommodate it. Thank you! Les |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)