Post Reply 
Is RPN still relevant?
10-07-2015, 10:58 PM
Post: #16
RE: Is RPN still relevant?
(10-07-2015 08:53 PM)Thomas Klemm Wrote:  You can do the same with multiplication:
\[
\begin{align}
12 \times 37 &= (4 \times 3) \times 37 \\
&= 4 \times (3 \times 37) \\
&= 4 \times 111 \\
&= 444
\end{align}
\]

It would feel easier to me, personally, to say 10x 37 = 370, then add 2x37 (=74) to that. But when written down, the old method of carry-the-number to the next column just seems less complicated than some of the elaborate breakdowns, appear to generate. Particularly with addition and subtraction. Long division and long multiplication was something my dad taught me when I was six (and I'll be eternally grateful to him for doing that!) -- but in the mid-1960s that was a more important art than it is today!
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
Is RPN still relevant? - Matt Agajanian - 10-05-2015, 12:57 AM
RE: Is RPN still relevant? - ColinJDenman - 10-05-2015, 04:04 AM
RE: Is RPN still relevant? - brouhaha - 10-06-2015, 06:07 AM
RE: Is RPN still relevant? - CR Haeger - 10-05-2015, 12:42 PM
RE: Is RPN still relevant? - JimP - 10-06-2015, 05:05 AM
RE: Is RPN still relevant? - Brian D - 10-06-2015, 07:49 AM
RE: Is RPN still relevant? - Harald - 10-06-2015, 09:57 AM
RE: Is RPN still relevant? - John Colvin - 10-07-2015, 08:13 PM
RE: Is RPN still relevant? - brickviking - 10-07-2015, 08:29 PM
RE: Is RPN still relevant? - Harald - 10-12-2015, 02:58 PM
RE: Is RPN still relevant? - Tugdual - 10-06-2015, 07:35 PM
RE: Is RPN still relevant? - Namir - 10-06-2015, 08:39 PM
RE: Is RPN still relevant? - SlideRule - 10-07-2015, 12:15 AM
RE: Is RPN still relevant? - Thomas Klemm - 10-07-2015, 08:53 PM
RE: Is RPN still relevant? - JimP - 10-07-2015 10:58 PM
RE: Is RPN still relevant? - ttw - 10-09-2015, 08:10 PM
RE: Is RPN still relevant? - Sukiari - 10-10-2015, 10:58 PM
RE: Is RPN still relevant? - Jlouis - 10-12-2015, 02:07 PM



User(s) browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)