Post Reply 
Is RPN still relevant?
10-12-2015, 02:58 PM
Post: #21
RE: Is RPN still relevant?
(10-07-2015 08:13 PM)John Colvin Wrote:  So I don't see how this method simplifies anything.
" I can't calculate 26+17 in one go either" - Why not?

Because I don't have enough fingers ;-P
No, seriously. I wouldn't know how to do it. Unless you simply know the answer.
I would add 10 and then 7. Wich is similar to what they teach - only straight forward rather then splitting into seemingly random parts before adding.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
Is RPN still relevant? - Matt Agajanian - 10-05-2015, 12:57 AM
RE: Is RPN still relevant? - ColinJDenman - 10-05-2015, 04:04 AM
RE: Is RPN still relevant? - brouhaha - 10-06-2015, 06:07 AM
RE: Is RPN still relevant? - CR Haeger - 10-05-2015, 12:42 PM
RE: Is RPN still relevant? - JimP - 10-06-2015, 05:05 AM
RE: Is RPN still relevant? - Brian D - 10-06-2015, 07:49 AM
RE: Is RPN still relevant? - Harald - 10-06-2015, 09:57 AM
RE: Is RPN still relevant? - John Colvin - 10-07-2015, 08:13 PM
RE: Is RPN still relevant? - brickviking - 10-07-2015, 08:29 PM
RE: Is RPN still relevant? - Harald - 10-12-2015 02:58 PM
RE: Is RPN still relevant? - Tugdual - 10-06-2015, 07:35 PM
RE: Is RPN still relevant? - Namir - 10-06-2015, 08:39 PM
RE: Is RPN still relevant? - SlideRule - 10-07-2015, 12:15 AM
RE: Is RPN still relevant? - Thomas Klemm - 10-07-2015, 08:53 PM
RE: Is RPN still relevant? - JimP - 10-07-2015, 10:58 PM
RE: Is RPN still relevant? - ttw - 10-09-2015, 08:10 PM
RE: Is RPN still relevant? - Sukiari - 10-10-2015, 10:58 PM
RE: Is RPN still relevant? - Jlouis - 10-12-2015, 02:07 PM



User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)