Post Reply 
newRPL: Named subroutines proposal
10-13-2015, 01:55 AM
Post: #3
RE: newRPL: Named subroutines proposal
As Helix showed, LSTO is more than sufficient without also introducing flow idiosyncrasies. Moreover, I imagine the proposed syntax would also cause conflicts with tagged objects. It would seem that each instance of an embedded tagged object used within a program would result in the unnecessary creation of a corresponding local variable that may not ever be called.

Graph 3D | QPI | SolveSys
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
RE: newRPL: Named subroutines proposal - Han - 10-13-2015 01:55 AM



User(s) browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)