newRPL: Named subroutines proposal
|
10-13-2015, 04:09 PM
Post: #4
|
|||
|
|||
RE: newRPL: Named subroutines proposal
(10-12-2015 11:30 PM)Helix Wrote: I don't like the fact that this syntax breaks the RPL logic (arguments first, followed by the function). True, you can always add a comment and it's almost the same. (10-13-2015 01:55 AM)Han Wrote: As Helix showed, LSTO is more than sufficient without also introducing flow idiosyncrasies. Moreover, I imagine the proposed syntax would also cause conflicts with tagged objects. It would seem that each instance of an embedded tagged object used within a program would result in the unnecessary creation of a corresponding local variable that may not ever be called. I didn't think much about the syntax, it could use other characters to avoid conflicts, but if the only two people who care about this project think it's not a good idea, then it probably isn't. Let's forget about this one. |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)