newRPL: Named subroutines proposal
|
10-13-2015, 11:09 PM
Post: #6
|
|||
|
|||
RE: newRPL: Named subroutines proposal
Here is another suggestion to make code more readable.
In RPL, code like A B SIN * C + 'Z' STO is not very clear. There is an elegant solution, provided that the flag -3 is set: 'Z=A*SIN(B)+C' DEFINE (I must admit that I have discovered this possibility only today!) It would be nice to have also the command LDEFINE, which would create a local variable, in the same way as LSTO. This would make newRPL more similar to modern languages, but still following the RPL syntax. Of course, there would be a cost in speed processing, but since newRPL is much faster than RPL, it could be interesting in most cases. Jean-Charles |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)