newRPL: Comments revisited
|
11-03-2015, 01:56 AM
Post: #3
|
|||
|
|||
RE: newRPL: Comments revisited
(11-02-2015 08:46 PM)Claudio L. Wrote: The topic of comments in the code was touched here before, but never put formally: These are flexible and cover just about any case one may need. But maybe it's worth clarifying what is meant by "permanent comment". I've assumed this means said comment remains in the compiled object, but if not, then I agree with David, its confusing. --Bob Prosperi |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
newRPL: Comments revisited - Claudio L. - 11-02-2015, 08:46 PM
RE: newRPL: Comments revisited - David Hayden - 11-02-2015, 08:56 PM
RE: newRPL: Comments revisited - rprosperi - 11-03-2015 01:56 AM
RE: newRPL: Comments revisited - Claudio L. - 11-03-2015, 06:07 PM
RE: newRPL: Comments revisited - matthiaspaul - 11-03-2015, 10:01 PM
RE: newRPL: Comments revisited - rprosperi - 11-03-2015, 10:38 PM
RE: newRPL: Comments revisited - Claudio L. - 11-04-2015, 03:21 AM
RE: newRPL: Comments revisited - matthiaspaul - 11-04-2015, 04:31 PM
RE: newRPL: Comments revisited - Claudio L. - 11-05-2015, 01:50 AM
RE: newRPL: Comments revisited - sa-penguin - 11-04-2015, 03:42 PM
RE: newRPL: Comments revisited - compsystems - 11-17-2015, 07:44 PM
RE: newRPL: Comments revisited - BarryMead - 11-17-2015, 08:35 PM
RE: newRPL: Comments revisited - Claudio L. - 11-18-2015, 02:06 AM
RE: newRPL: Comments revisited - timofonic - 01-07-2016, 09:05 PM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)