Post Reply 
digits in x
11-22-2015, 05:49 PM
Post: #7
RE: digits in x
(11-22-2015 05:43 PM)Marcus von Cube Wrote:  
(11-22-2015 05:40 PM)fhub Wrote:  Not correct for powers of 10: 10, 100, 1000 ...
Good catch! You can still do g LG IP INC X

...and get errors due to roundoff errors for x very close to integer powers of 10.
The 34s has a better option: EXPT, cf. my respective post which I wrote before Franz and you responded. #-)

Dieter
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
digits in x - ggauny@live.fr - 11-22-2015, 04:29 PM
RE: digits in x - Didier Lachieze - 11-22-2015, 04:58 PM
RE: digits in x - ggauny@live.fr - 11-22-2015, 05:22 PM
RE: digits in x - fhub - 11-22-2015, 05:40 PM
RE: digits in x - Marcus von Cube - 11-22-2015, 05:43 PM
RE: digits in x - Dieter - 11-22-2015 05:49 PM
RE: digits in x - Marcus von Cube - 11-22-2015, 05:51 PM
RE: digits in x - Didier Lachieze - 11-22-2015, 05:56 PM
RE: digits in x - ggauny@live.fr - 11-22-2015, 06:33 PM
RE: digits in x - fhub - 11-23-2015, 11:58 AM
RE: digits in x - ggauny@live.fr - 11-24-2015, 09:34 AM
RE: digits in x - Dieter - 11-22-2015, 05:46 PM
RE: digits in x - ggauny@live.fr - 11-23-2015, 04:48 PM
RE: digits in x - ggauny@live.fr - 11-24-2015, 11:05 AM
RE: digits in x - fhub - 11-24-2015, 12:07 PM
RE: digits in x - ggauny@live.fr - 11-24-2015, 07:03 PM
RE: digits in x - ggauny@live.fr - 11-24-2015, 07:39 PM



User(s) browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)