digits in x
|
11-22-2015, 06:33 PM
Post: #10
|
|||
|
|||
RE: digits in x
(11-22-2015 05:56 PM)Didier Lachieze Wrote: Here is another solution in two steps: EXPT INC X I adopte this, economy of one step, your are cunning like a Sioux, we say in french ! I was not thinking in 10 powered, because in Kaprekar number it is not possible (I think). My solution was walking with 10 powered, but one step is one step. Once upon a time, when machine has no mutch memory, we search to short routine. GĂ©rard. |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
digits in x - ggauny@live.fr - 11-22-2015, 04:29 PM
RE: digits in x - Didier Lachieze - 11-22-2015, 04:58 PM
RE: digits in x - ggauny@live.fr - 11-22-2015, 05:22 PM
RE: digits in x - fhub - 11-22-2015, 05:40 PM
RE: digits in x - Marcus von Cube - 11-22-2015, 05:43 PM
RE: digits in x - Dieter - 11-22-2015, 05:49 PM
RE: digits in x - Marcus von Cube - 11-22-2015, 05:51 PM
RE: digits in x - Didier Lachieze - 11-22-2015, 05:56 PM
RE: digits in x - ggauny@live.fr - 11-22-2015 06:33 PM
RE: digits in x - fhub - 11-23-2015, 11:58 AM
RE: digits in x - ggauny@live.fr - 11-24-2015, 09:34 AM
RE: digits in x - Dieter - 11-22-2015, 05:46 PM
RE: digits in x - ggauny@live.fr - 11-23-2015, 04:48 PM
RE: digits in x - ggauny@live.fr - 11-24-2015, 11:05 AM
RE: digits in x - fhub - 11-24-2015, 12:07 PM
RE: digits in x - ggauny@live.fr - 11-24-2015, 07:03 PM
RE: digits in x - ggauny@live.fr - 11-24-2015, 07:39 PM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)